JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buesching, W J
Right arrow Articles by Washington, J A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buesching, W J
Right arrow Articles by Washington, J A, 2nd

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1979 October; 10(4): 454-458

Evaluation of the modified Micro-ID system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

W J Buesching, D L Rhoden, A O Esaias, P B Smith and J A Washington 2nd

ABSTRACT

Micro-ID is a system designed to identify the Enterobacteriaceae by utilizing reagent-impregnated disks for 15 biochemical tests. Since its initial evaluations, the system has undergone modification in formulation and in its computer data base. In a dual-center evaluation, 306 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae were tested: 145 common and typical isolates at the Mayo Clinic and 161 unusual or atypical isolates at the Center for Disease Control. Each laboratory also exchanged 50 cultures to test the system's reproducibility. Micro-ID correctly identified 142 (98%) of the common clinical isolates and 123 (76%) of the unusual or atypical organisms. However, in this latter group, three species tested were not in the system's data base. When these organisms were deleted from the analysis, 138 of 146 (95%) of the unusual or atypical isolates were correctly identified. Analysis of the 100 isolates identified in duplicate revealed 93% reproducibility of genus and species identification and 62% reproducibility of octal code numbers. Of the 31 strains with the same identification but different code numbers, 74% differed in only one biochemical test.


J Clin Microbiol. 1979 October; 10(4): 454-458







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1979 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.