This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Slifkin, M Articles by Pouchet-Melvin, G R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Slifkin, M Articles by Pouchet-Melvin, G R

Evaluation of three commercially available test products for serogrouping beta-hemolytic streptococci.

ABSTRACT

Three beta-streptococci serogrouping kits, Phadebact, SeroSTAT, and Streptex, were evaluated as to their sensitivity, accuracy, and suitability as methods for serogrouping streptococci in a clinical microbiology laboratory. The majority of the primary isolates examined by the various methods associated with each of the three kits were correctly identified. The Streptex direct mixed-culture procedure was more often associated with the observation of cross-reactivity than with the direct procedures of the other two kits which did not employ mixed growth cultures. Furthermore, the Streptex kit was associated with more false-negative responses than those determined by the other two kits under evaluation. These results appeared to be due to the relatively poor sensitivity of the Streptex grouping reagents. The Streptex test procedures required more labor than the other kit procedures, requiring a 1-h enzymatic extraction step for the release of the group antigens. The SeroSTAT kit provided only a direct procedure and, thus, is limited in its application. The Phadebact procedures were the most versatile by providing not only a direct and a 24-h grouping procedure, but also by including a 4-h method that may be employed as required by the clinical microbiologist.