JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nolan, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, K.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nolan, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, K.-H.
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 July; 12(1): 22-26

Evaluation of a New Assay for Vi Antibody in Chronic Carriers of Salmonella typhi

Charles M. Nolan1, John C. Feeley2, Paul C. White Jr.3, Edith A. Hambie2, Susan L. Brown2 and Kwei-Hay Wong2

1 Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas College of Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205
3 Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205
2 Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia 30333

ABSTRACT

The assay for serum antibody to the Salmonella typhi capsular polysaccharide (Vi) antigen has recently been revised because of the availability of a purified, highly polymerized Vi antigen. We compared this revised Vi antibody assay to the traditional one for potential usefulness in the surveillance of chronic enteric carriers of S. typhi. The purified Vi antigen of Citrobacter freundii was incorporated into a passive hemagglutination assay for serum Vi antibody; the standard Vi antibody assay was also a hemagglutination assay that employed as the Vi antigen a crude extract of Citrobacter (Ballerup O group 29). As determined by the revised assay, Vi antibody was found in the sera of 22 (71%) of 31 current typhoid carriers, none of 6 resolved carriers, and none of 22 control subjects. According to the traditional assay, Vi antibody was present in 23 of those current carriers (74%), 1 of the resolved carriers (17%), and 4 of the control subjects (18%). The rate of false-positive Vi antibody tests among resolved carriers and control subjects was less with the revised assay (P < 0.05). Successful antimicrobial therapy resulted in a reversion to seronegativity within 1 year in 8 of 10 Vipositive carriers according to the revised assay, but in only 3 of 11 according to the standard assay (P < 0.05). During a 2-year period of observation, 15 (94%) of 16 current typhoid carriers had at least one positive purified Vi antibody test; among 12 of those patients with Vi titers of 1:40 or greater, 9 (75%) were continuously Vi positive. Thus, the revised Vi antibody assay is more specific and no less sensitive than the standard assay for the condition of current enteric carriage of S. typhi. This serological test could be of value in the surveillance of typhoid carriers by public health agencies.


J Clin Microbiol. 1980 July; 12(1): 22-26




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1980 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.