JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahlberg, T
Right arrow Articles by Branefors, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dahlberg, T
Right arrow Articles by Branefors, P
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 August; 12(2): 185-192

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for titration of Haemophilus influenzae capsular and O antigen antibodies.

T Dahlberg and P Branefors

ABSTRACT

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was elaborated for the detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies against capsular and O antigens of Haemophilus influenzae. Purified capsular polysaccharide and lipopolysaccharide were used as antigens, with optimal coating concentrations being about 50 and 100 micrograms/ml, respectively. The antibody content was expressed as the highest serum dilution (-log10) showing an absorbance of 0.2 above the background level. The titers of hyperimmune sera (reference sera) ranged between 5 and 7 -log10. The sensitivity of the method was about 80 ng/ml with regard to anticapsular antibodies and 3 to 5 ng/ml with regard to anti-lipopolysaccharide antibodies. For detection of antibodies against capsular polysaccharide in sera obtained after primary immunization, ELISA was about 100-fold more sensitive than the indirect hemagglutination assay, whereas in hyperimmune sera, ELISA was about 10-fold more sensitive than the indirect hemagglutination assay. The sensitivity of ELISA for detecting anticapsular antibodies after primary and booster immunizations was 50-fold higher than that of the bactericidal assay using capsulated bacteria, whereas the sensitivity of the two methods was the same when hyperimmune sera were tested. ELISA performed with lipopolysaccharide as the antigen was about 50- and 150-fold more sensitive than the complement fixation and bactericidal assays tested with noncapsulated variants after primary injection and hyperimmunization, respectively.


J Clin Microbiol. 1980 August; 12(2): 185-192







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1980 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.