This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thornsberry, C Articles by Spencer, H J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thornsberry, C Articles by Spencer, H J

Clinical laboratory evaluation of the Abbott MS-2 automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

ABSTRACT

The MS-2 system (Abbott Diagnostics, Division of Abbott Laboratories, Dallas, Tex.) was evaluated for its efficacy in determining the susceptibilities of both clinical and selected challenge (nonfastidious, facultative, and aerobic) isolates. The MS-2 results were compared with standard Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and microdilution results by using fresh clinical isolates. For gram-positive isolates other than enterococci, overall agreement between MS-2 and reference results was 93 to 98%. With enterococci, MS-2 agreement with disk diffusion was 68% but with microdilution was 86% (agreement between disk diffusion and microdilution was 73%). The main discrepancies with enterococci were with cephalothin, penicillin, gentamicin, and kanamycin. With clinical gram-negative isolates, the overall agreement was 91 to 93%, with most discrepancies occurring with Enterobacter spp. and beta-lactam antibiotics (MS-2 versus disk diffusion, 84%; MS-2 versus microdilution, 84%; disk diffusion versus microdilution, 87%) and with Serratia spp. and colistin (false-susceptible results). The agreement of MS-2 results with established reference antibiograms of a special collection of challenge strains was 91 to 97% for the gram-positive cocci and 86 to 98% for the gram-negative strains. (With Enterobacter spp., agreement was 86%, but was greater than 90% for all other organism groups.) Of the 98 finite MS-2 minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) that could be directly compared with microdilution MICs, 77 (79%) were within +/- 1 well of the geometric mean microdilution MIC. MS-2 analysis time ranged from 2.8 to 6.5 h (mean, 4.2 h). On the basis of these results, we conclude that the MS-2 can be expected to yield rapid and accurate results with most nonfastidious, facultative, and aerobic pathogens.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Donay, J.-L., Mathieu, D., Fernandes, P., Pregermain, C., Bruel, P., Wargnier, A., Casin, I., Weill, F. X., Lagrange, P. H., Herrmann, J. L. (2004). Evaluation of the Automated Phoenix System for Potential Routine Use in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 1542-1546 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Di Bonaventura, G., Ricci, E., Della Loggia, N., Catamo, G., Piccolomini, R. (1998). Evaluation of the E Test for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Patients with Long-Term Bladder Catheterization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36: 824-826 [Abstract] [Full Text]