This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Barrett, T J Articles by Blake, P A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Barrett, T J Articles by Blake, P A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1981 January; 13(1): 126-129

Epidemiological usefulness of changes in hemolytic activity of Vibrio cholerae biotype El Tor during the seventh pandemic.

ABSTRACT

Hemolytic Vibrio cholerae biotype El Tor strains were isolated in the United States in 1973 and 1978 after they had supposedly disappeared worldwide during the 1960s and 1970s. We decided to examine the change in prevalence of hemolytic El Tor strains since the beginning of the seventh pandemic and evaluate the usefulness of hemolytic activity as an epidemiological marker. A total of 48 isolates of V. cholerae biotype El Tor isolated in the Eastern Hemisphere between 1960 and 1979, along with 1 Texas (1973) and 38 Louisiana (1978) isolates, were tested for hemolytic activity by each of four methods. One method (utilizing heart infusion broth with 1% glycerol) was slightly superior for detecting hemolytic activity. Titers obtained with this method ranged from less than 2 to 1,024. Of 13 (76.9%) strains from the earliest part of the current pandemic, 10 were hemolytic, compared with 1 of 26 (3.8%) strains isolated in the period from 1966 to 1979 in the Eastern Hemisphere, indicating that nonhemolytic El Tor strains have replaced the hemolytic variety there. In contrast, all 38 Louisiana isolates and the Texas isolate were strongly hemolytic. Hemolytic activity was concluded to be a useful epidemiological marker.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Yoon, S. S., Mekalanos, J. J. (2006). 2,3-Butanediol Synthesis and the Emergence of the Vibrio cholerae El Tor Biotype. Infect. Immun. 74: 6547-6556 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Safa, A., Bhuyian, N. A., Nusrin, S., Ansaruzzaman, M., Alam, M., Hamabata, T., Takeda, Y., Sack, D. A., Nair, G. B. (2006). Genetic characteristics of Matlab variants of Vibrio cholerae O1 that are hybrids between classical and El Tor biotypes.. J Med Microbiol 55: 1563-1569 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Iyer, L., Vadivelu, J. (2006). Molecular Analysis of Vibrio cholerae Strains Isolated in Malaysia: Public Health Implications. Asia Pac J Public Health 18: 33-41  
• Safa, A., Bhuiyan, N. A., Alam, M., Sack, D. A., Nair, G. B. (2005). Genomic Relatedness of the New Matlab Variants of Vibrio cholerae O1 to the Classical and El Tor Biotypes as Determined by Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 1401-1404 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Karaolis, D. K. R., Lan, R., Kaper, J. B., Reeves, P. R. (2001). Comparison of Vibrio cholerae Pathogenicity Islands in Sixth and Seventh Pandemic Strains. Infect. Immun. 69: 1947-1952 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Singh, D. V., Matte, M. H., Matte, G. R., Jiang, S., Sabeena, F., Shukla, B. N., Sanyal, S. C., Huq, A., Colwell, R. R. (2001). Molecular Analysis of Vibrio cholerae O1, O139, non-O1, and non-O139 Strains: Clonal Relationships between Clinical and Environmental Isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 910-921 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Byun, R., Elbourne, L. D. H., Lan, R., Reeves, P. R. (1999). Evolutionary Relationships of Pathogenic Clones of Vibrio cholerae by Sequence Analysis of Four Housekeeping Genes. Infect. Immun. 67: 1116-1124 [Abstract] [Full Text]