This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wilkinson, H W Articles by Broome, C V Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wilkinson, H W Articles by Broome, C V

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1981 January; 13(1): 139-146

Validation of Legionella pneumophila indirect immunofluorescence assay with epidemic sera.

ABSTRACT

Sera from six outbreaks of legionellosis and four outbreaks of pneumonia of other etiologies were tested with the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) as currently performed. The current IFA is at least as sensitive as the original test in detecting cases of Legionnaires disease (78 to 91%). By using Center for Disease Control criteria for a positive (fourfold increase in titer during convalescence to greater than or equal to 128) or presumptive (single titer greater than or equal to 256) serological test, the specificity exceeded 99%. No cross-reactions against Legionella pneumophila antigens were observed among sera from epidemic cases of Q fever, tularemia, and psittacosis; the only positive L. pneumophila IFA titer among the epidemic Mycoplasma pneumonia sera was reduced to a negative titer with an immunosorbent extracted from Escherichia coli strain O13:K92:H4. The slight increase in specificity (to 100%), however, was offset by a slight decrease in sensitivity. The sensitivity of the IFA was maximal when a conjugate that detected immunoglobulins G, M, and A was used. IFA titers were not significantly altered by replacing the monovalent serogroup 1 antigen with a polyvalent antigen (serogroups 1 through 4) nor by the presence of rheumatoid factor or heat-labile serum factors.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Rojas, A., Navarro, M. D., Fornes, F. E., Serra, E., Simarro, E., Rojas, J., Ruiz, J. (2005). Value of Serological Testing for Diagnosis of Legionellosis in Outbreak Patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43: 4022-4025 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lindsay, D. S.J., Abraham, W. H., Findlay, W., Christie, P., Johnston, F., Edwards, G. F.S. (2004). Laboratory diagnosis of legionnaires' disease due to Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1: comparison of phenotypic and genotypic methods. J Med Microbiol 53: 183-187 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fields, B. S., Benson, R. F., Besser, R. E. (2002). Legionella and Legionnaires' Disease: 25 Years of Investigation. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15: 506-526 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Benkel, D. H, McClure, E. M, Woolard, D., Rullan, J. V, Miller, G. B Jr, Jenkins, S. R, Hershey, J. H, Benson, R. F, Pruckler, J. M, Brown, E. W, Kolczak, M. S, Hackler, R. L, Rouse, B. S, Breiman, R. F (2000). Outbreak of Legionnaires' disease associated with a display whirlpool spa. Int J Epidemiol 29: 1092-1098 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Tan, M. J., Tan, J. S., Hamor, R. H., File, T. M. Jr., Breiman, R. F. (2000). The Radiologic Manifestations of Legionnaire’s Disease. Chest 117: 398-403 [Abstract] [Full Text]