JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by La Scolea, L J
Right arrow Articles by Neter, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by La Scolea, L J, Jr
Right arrow Articles by Neter, E

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1981 March; 13(3): 478-482

Diagnosis of bacteremia in children by quantitative direct plating and a radiometric procedure.

L J La Scolea Jr, D Dryja, T D Sullivan, L Mosovich, N Ellerstein and E Neter

ABSTRACT

During a 1-year period, three bacteriological systems for detecting bacteremia in children were analyzed, namely, the BACTEC system (Johnston Laboratories, Inc., Cockeysville, Md.), the Fisher/Lederle bottle (Lederle Diagnostics, Pearl River, N.Y.), and a direct plating method of blood termed quantitative direct plating (QDP). Of 2,123 blood cultures, 135 (6.4%) were positive; Haemophilus influenzae type b, Neisseria meningitidis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae accounted for 3.4%, representing 61 patients, other pathogens accounted for 0.6%, and contaminants accounted for 2.4%. Of 72 cultures yielding H. influenzae, N. meningitidis, and S. pneumoniae, 60 were recovered by both broth systems, 2 by BACTEC only and 10 by Fisher/Lederle bottle only. The BACTEC system failed to register a positive growth index reading by 24 h in 15 cultures which were positive for H. influenzae, even though growth had occurred, as shown by positive subculture and microscopy at this time. QDP detected 89% of the cultures positive for H. influenzae and N. meningitidis, of which 55% yielded results before either broth procedure. Only 50% of the cultures positive for S. pneumoniae yielded growth on QDP. This difference in the recovery rate probably is accounted for by the number of organisms in the blood. Thus, more than 100 organisms per ml of blood were found in 71% of cultures positive for H. influenzae and N. meningitidis but in only 7% of those positive for S. pneumoniae. These studies, then, have revealed that H. influenzae, which grew well in BACTEC broth, did not, however, give a significant growth index reading during day 1 of incubation, in contrast to N. meningitidis and S. pneumoniae. The QDP system not only provided information on the magnitude of bacteremia due to H. influenzae and N. meningitidis but frequently allowed earlier diagnosis and, thus, proved to be a valuable, simple, and inexpensive supplementary technique for broth cultures, although not for the diagnosis of S. pneumoniae bacteremia.


J Clin Microbiol. 1981 March; 13(3): 478-482




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.