JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M T
Right arrow Articles by Balfour, L C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M T
Right arrow Articles by Balfour, L C

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1981 April; 13(4): 677-680

Evaluation and optimization of urine screening by Autobac.

M T Kelly and L C Balfour

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Autobac (Pfizer Inc., New York, N.Y.) urine screen for detection of bacteriuria in 3,026 urine specimens and to establish the optimum procedure for the Autobac system. Overall, 97% of urine specimens having greater than 10(5) colony-forming units (CFU) per ml were detected within 5 h by the Autobac system. The system detected 66, 90, and 94% of such specimens after 2, 3, and 4 h of incubation, respectively. Of specimens having 10(4) to 10(5) CFU/ml, the Autobac system detected 10, 45, 53, and 95% after 2, 3, 4, and 5 h of incubation, respectively. The rate of false-positive results increased from 0% after 2 h to 2% after 3 h to 6% after 4 h and 25% after 5 h of incubation. The specificity of the urine screening results also varied with the incubation time. Percentages of specimens having greater than 10(5) CFU/ml that gave positive urine screening results at various times were as follows: 96% at 2 h, 74% at 3 h, 29% at 4 h, and 9% at 5 h. These findings suggest that a 3- or 4-h urine screening procedure will effectively detect bacteriuria of greater than 10(5) CFU/ml, with few false-positive results. However, a 5-h procedure, which gives more false-positive results, may be needed for detection of lower levels of bacteriuria.


J Clin Microbiol. 1981 April; 13(4): 677-680







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.