JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarantola, D J
Right arrow Articles by Foster, S O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tarantola, D J
Right arrow Articles by Foster, S O

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1981 April; 13(4): 723-725

Immunofluorescence staining for detection of variola virus.

D J Tarantola, F Huq, J H Nakano and S O Foster

ABSTRACT

In September 1975 Bangladesh was the only country in the world with endemic variola major, and the eradication of the disease was imminent. A rapid and accurate laboratory diagnostic method was required to supplement immunodiffusion in agar gel and culture on chorioallantoic membrane of embryonated egg available at the Institute of Public Health in Dacca, Bangladesh. To determine its effectiveness, a new, improved immunofluorescence (IF) staining technique was introduced. Laboratory specimens (scabs or vesicular or pustular impressions) were collected from patients who had, or were suspected of having, smallpox. Seventy-eight of 144 specimens collected were found to be IF positive for smallpox. As the number of laboratory-positive cases far exceeded the number of clinically diagnosed smallpox cases, IF-positive cases were reinvestigated and subsamples of the IF-positive specimens were tested at a World Health Organization poxvirus reference laboratory at the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, Ga. The results indicated 100% sensitivity for the IF technique (no false-negative results) in diagnosing variola major but also showed a high rate of false-positive results. Consequently, IF could not be recommended as a routine screening test for smallpox.


J Clin Microbiol. 1981 April; 13(4): 723-725




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.