This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gunn, B A Articles by Kapper, C O Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gunn, B A Articles by Kapper, C O

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1981 August; 14(2): 195-200

Comparison of methods for identifying Staphylococcus and Micrococcus spp.

ABSTRACT

Three methods employed to distinguish staphylococci from micrococci were compared, using clinical and environmental strains. When these methods are used, misinterpretation of results, as well as erratic results, may occur, and suggestions for eliminating these problems are provided. The most sensitive test that combines ease of use and speed in obtaining results for distinguishing the two genera is the lysostaphin susceptibility test. Two other tests, facultatively anaerobic growth in semisolid thioglycolate agar and fermentation of dextrose, may also be used to distinguish these two genera, but results are often slow in developing, are subject to technical difficulties, and may lead to incorrect assignment of certain species of staphylococci and micrococci to their proper genera.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Bascomb, S., Manafi, M. (1998). Use of Enzyme Tests in Characterization and Identification of Aerobic and Facultatively Anaerobic Gram-Positive Cocci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11: 318-340 [Abstract] [Full Text]