This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lauer, B A Articles by Mirrett, S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lauer, B A Articles by Mirrett, S

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1981 August; 14(2): 201-205

Comparison of acridine orange and Gram stains for detection of microorganisms in cerebrospinal fluid and other clinical specimens.

ABSTRACT

Acridine orange, a fluorochrome strain, is potentially superior to the Gram stain in the direct microscopic examination of clinical specimens because it gives striking differential staining between bacteria and background cells and debris. Its value in clinical laboratories was evaluated by testing 209 cerebrospinal fluids and 288 other body fluids, tissues, and exudates by both techniques. Smears were made in duplicate, fixed with methanol, stained, and examined without knowledge of the result of the companion smear or culture. Overall, acridine orange was slightly more sensitive than the Gram stain (acridine orange, 59.9%; Gram stain, 55.8%) and equally specific in detecting microorganisms. One smear was falsely positive by the Gram stain; none was falsely positive by the acridine orange stain. We conclude that acridine orange staining is a sensitive method for screening clinical specimens and reviewing selected specimens that are purulent, but negative by the Gram stain. Bloody fluids, thick exudates, and other normally difficult-to-read specimens were easily and quickly examined. We recommend, however, that positive smears be reexamined with the Gram stain to confirm the result and determine the Gram reaction of the microorganisms.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• PADDOCK, C. D., KOSS, T., EREMEEVA, M. E., DASCH, G. A., ZAKI, S. R., SUMNER, J. W. (2006). ISOLATION OF RICKETTSIA AKARI FROM ESCHARS OF PATIENTS WITH RICKETTSIALPOX.. Am J Trop Med Hyg 75: 732-738 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Eremeeva, M. E., Bosserman, E. A., Demma, L. J., Zambrano, M. L., Blau, D. M., Dasch, G. A. (2006). Isolation and Identification of Rickettsia massiliae from Rhipicephalus sanguineus Ticks Collected in Arizona. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 5569-5577 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Durtschi, J. D, Erali, M., Bromley, L K., Herrmann, M. G, Petti, C. A, Smith, R. E, Voelkerding, K. V (2005). Increased sensitivity of bacterial detection in cerebrospinal fluid by fluorescent staining on low-fluorescence membrane filters. J Med Microbiol 54: 843-850 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Eremeeva, M. E., Dasch, G. A., Silverman, D. J. (2001). Quantitative Analyses of Variations in the Injury of Endothelial Cells Elicited by 11 Isolates of Rickettsia rickettsii. CVI 8: 788-796 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wang, B., Kraig, E., Kolodrubetz, D. (2000). Use of Defined Mutants To Assess the Role of the Campylobacter rectus S-Layer in Bacterium-Epithelial Cell Interactions. Infect. Immun. 68: 1465-1473 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Eremeeva, M. E., Silverman, D. J. (1998). Effects of the Antioxidant alpha -Lipoic Acid on Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells Infected with Rickettsia rickettsii. Infect. Immun. 66: 2290-2299 [Abstract] [Full Text]