JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, M K
Right arrow Articles by Cassell, G H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, M K
Right arrow Articles by Cassell, G H

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1981 December; 14(6): 646-655

Comparison of methods for detection of Mycoplasma pulmonis in experimentally and naturally infected rats.

M K Davidson, J R Lindsey, M B Brown, T R Schoeb and G H Cassell

ABSTRACT

Isolation, indirect immunofluorescence, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and histopathological examination of tissues for characteristic lesions were evaluated for their efficiency in detecting Mycoplasma pulmonis infection in rats. Whereas all of the methods were efficient in naturally infected Sprague-Dawley rats, none of the methods consistently detected infection in F344 rats experimentally infected with low doses of the organism. In the experimental infections, however, the success rate of any method was directly related (P less than 0.05) to increasing inoculum dose and time postinoculation. Collectively, the data indicated that isolation of M. pulmonis was the most efficient single detection method and the nasopharyngeal duct was the best single site to culture, although sampling of multiple sites within the respiratory tract increased the rate of isolating the organism. The ELISA was understandably the least sensitive method in the low-dose, experimentally infected rats because of the time required for development of a detectable serum antibody response. Although each of the four methods identified a high percentage of naturally infected rats, the ELISA was the most efficient method in these animals as it was uniformly positive. The use of combinations of methods was found to increase the rate of detection of M. pulmonis infection in both experimentally and naturally infected rats.


J Clin Microbiol. 1981 December; 14(6): 646-655







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1981 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.