JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buck, G E
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buck, G E
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, M T

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1982 January; 15(1): 41-42

Evaluation of the CampyPak II gas generator system for isolation of Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni.

G E Buck, C Fojtasek, K Calvert and M T Kelly

ABSTRACT

The CampyPak II (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) method for isolating Campylobacter fetus subsp. jejuni was evaluated with clinical specimens by comparison with an evacuation replacement procedure. Of 757 specimens, 26 (3.4%) were positive for C. fetus subsp. jejuni. All 26 were recovered by both systems. No difference was found in the time necessary for isolation, except with one isolate that required 3 days for isolation with CampyPak II and 2 days with the established procedure. Although the average colony size was slightly smaller for colonies incubated in the CampyPak II system (P less than 0.02 by a paired t test), this is probably of no practical consequence. In terms of technical performance, therefore, the CampyPak II system appears to be an excellent alternative method for establishing microaerophilic conditions necessary for isolating C. fetus subsp. jejuni. The only difference between the two systems was the cost of using the CampyPak II envelopes. Excluding the initial equipment costs, CampyPak II envelopes cost approximately $0.74 per specimen, whereas the standard Torbal jar technique cost about $0.10 per specimen.


J Clin Microbiol. 1982 January; 15(1): 41-42







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.