JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Appleman, M D
Right arrow Articles by Heseltine, P N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Appleman, M D
Right arrow Articles by Heseltine, P N
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 February; 15(2): 278-281

Evaluation of the Antibiotic Removal Device.

M D Appleman, R S Swinney and P N Heseltine

ABSTRACT

A new system called an Antibiotic Removal Device (ARD), used for the removal of residual antibiotics in blood specimens, was studied in 300 patients diagnosed as clinically septic despite antimicrobial therapy. Blood specimens from these patients were processed with and without the ARD into aerobic and anaerobic media. There were 53 patients who had one or more positive blood culture bottles, for a total of 109 positive blood culture bottles. Of these 109 bottles, 33.9% were positive with ARD-processed blood in aerobic media, 24.8% with ARD-processed blood in anaerobic media, 22.9% with conventionally processed blood in aerobic media, and 18.3% with conventionally processed specimens in anaerobic media. After 6 h of incubation, 14 bottles with blood processed by the ARD and 9 bottles processed conventionally were positive; after 24 h, 48 bottles with blood processed by the ARD and 31 bottles processed conventionally were positive. The same organisms were isolated from both ARD- and conventionally processed blood, with four exceptions. The ARD system, when compared with a conventional system of blood specimen processing, significantly increased the detection of bacteremia and decreased the time required for its detection in patients clinically septic despite ongoing antimicrobial therapy.


J Clin Microbiol. 1982 February; 15(2): 278-281




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.