JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R L
Right arrow Articles by Mallison, G F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R L
Right arrow Articles by Mallison, G F
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 March; 15(3): 408-415

Carpeting in hospitals: an epidemiological evaluation.

R L Anderson, D C Mackel, B S Stoler and G F Mallison

ABSTRACT

Epidemiological and microbiological studies were conducted in a hospital room with carpet (CR) and in one with carpet (NCR). Microbiological profiles were determined with specimens obtained from patients admitted to these rooms. Patient records were reviewed to note infection status and other case identities. Eleven-millimeter cylindrical core samples of carpet were obtained, and swab template techniques were used on the bare floor for subsequent enumeration and identification of contaminating microorganisms. In each sampling period, higher microbial counts per square inch (1 in(2) = ca 6.452 cm(2)) were measured for the carpet than for the bare floor. Recovery rates of Enterobacter spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli were higher from carpet samples than from bare floor samples. Typable organisms (such as E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, and Staphylococcus aureus) obtained from patients were also more frequently recovered from the carpet than from the bare flooring. Patients who stayed in the CR were shown to be colonized with the same types of organisms as those initially recovered from the carpet. However, no statistically significant differences were found in patients in the CR versus NCR in colonization with all typable and nontypable organisms first found on the floor. Disease in patients was found not to be associated with organisms found as contaminants of the carpet or the bare floor. Air above carpeting contained more consistent concentrations of organisms than air above the bare flooring.


J Clin Microbiol. 1982 March; 15(3): 408-415







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.