JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, L S
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, R Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, L S
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, R Y
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 April; 15(4): 603-605

Comparison of indirect fluorescent-antibody amoebic serology with counterimmunoelectrophoresis and indirect hemagglutination amoebic serologies.

L S Garcia, D A Bruckner, T C Brewer and R Y Shimizu

ABSTRACT

Patients ranged from those with no prior diagnosis of or suspected exposure to Entamoeba histolytica to those with proven amoebic liver abscesses (extraintestinal disease). A comparison of serologies from patients with proven and suspected amoebiasis or possible past exposure revealed good correlation between the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) procedure and the other methods used, counterimmunoelectrophoresis and indirect hemagglutination. Titers from patients with proven extraintestinal amoebiasis were in the expected high range previously reported by other authors. Patients with clinical histories suggestive of exposure to E. histolytica but no proven disease had lower titers which indicated possible background exposure. The IFA procedure provides a rapid method of antibody detection; results obtained on an emergency basis provide essential information in making the diagnosis of amoebic abscess, pyogenic abscess, or tumor. The IFA procedure is rapid, reliable reproducible, and relatively inexpensive to perform, provided a good source of antigen is consistently available.


J Clin Microbiol. 1982 April; 15(4): 603-605




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.