JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Standard, P G
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Standard, P G
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, L
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 April; 15(4): 663-667

Safety considerations in handling exoantigen extracts from pathogenic fungi.

P G Standard and L Kaufman

ABSTRACT

Currently, exoantigen test procedures for identifying mycelial form cultures of pathogenic molds require that the fungi being extracted be treated with thimerosal to render them safe for handling. Recent studies have demonstrated that thimerosal may not be fungicidal. In view of these reports, we investigated the effects of thimerosal and formaldehyde on a variety of exoantigen preparations. Mature mycelial form fungal cultures, including cultures of Blastomyces dermatitidis, Coccidioides immitis, and Histoplasma capsulatum and morphologically similar fungi, were grown on Sabouraud dextrose agar slants and treated with 0.02, 0.04, and 0.08% thimerosal for 24 and 48 h and with 0.2 and 0.5% formaldehyde for 24 and 48 h. We found that 0.5% formaldehyde killed all of the fungi studied, whereas 0.2% formaldehyde permitted the growth of only one fungus; 0.02, 0.04, and 0.08% thimerosal were fungistatic. Furthermore, 0.2 and 0.5% formaldehyde and 0.08% thimerosal affected certain antigens adversely. For those investigators who prefer to use 0.02% thimerosal and to work with sterile extracts, we recommend that the procedure be modified, and we advocate sterilization of extracts by passage through membrane filters.


J Clin Microbiol. 1982 April; 15(4): 663-667




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.