JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stobberingh, E E
Right arrow Articles by van Boven, C P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stobberingh, E E
Right arrow Articles by van Boven, C P

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May; 15(5): 795-801

Comparison of different tobramycin assays.

E E Stobberingh, A W Houben and C P van Boven

ABSTRACT

Three commercial available tobramycin assays, the fluorescent immunoassay (AMES), the Diagnostic Products Corp. radioimmunoassay, and the Nuclear Medical System radioimmunoassay, were compared with the microbiological assay and the chemical assay involving high-performance liquid chromatography. The results obtained with each assay were evaluated in terms of usefulness, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness.

J Clin Microbiol. 1982 May; 15(5): 795-801






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.