JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woolfrey, B F
Right arrow Articles by Quall, C O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woolfrey, B F
Right arrow Articles by Quall, C O
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 October; 16(4): 663-667

Broth microdilution testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and aminoglycosides: need for employing dilutions differing by small arithmetic increments.

B F Woolfrey, J M Fox, R T Lally and C O Quall

ABSTRACT

The use of dilutions differing by small arithmetic increments was studied as a means for improving the definition and measurement of minimum inhibitory concentrations and precision parameters for testing Pseudomonas aeruginosa versus the aminoglycosides by the broth microdilution test. For five strains of P. aeruginosa versus gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin, comparisons were made of minimum inhibitory concentrations which were replicated in parallel by using three microdilution systems: small increment panels prepared by us, modified twofold dilution panels prepared by us, and similar modified twofold dilution panels obtained commercially. The small increment dilutions were prepared to differ by concentrations of 1.0 microgram/ml for gentamicin and tobramycin and by 2.0 micrograms/ml for amikacin. Use of the small increment dilutions resulted in the ability to measure minimum inhibitory concentrations at more closely spaced intervals than those dictated by modified twofold dilution schemes, and confidence limits were significantly improved. The average coefficient of variation for the small increment microdilution test results was 9.5%, with 99.5% of minimum inhibitory concentrations falling within +/- 2 small increment dilutions from their modal values.


J Clin Microbiol. 1982 October; 16(4): 663-667







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.