This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Smith, J A Articles by Porter, D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Smith, J A Articles by Porter, D

Rapid method for determining antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae.

ABSTRACT

A method was developed to determine the susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to ampicillin, cefamandole, and chloramphenicol by using the MS-2 system (Abbott Laboratories) for determining minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC). The MS-2 results for 132 strains of H. influenzae were compared with the results of agar disk diffusion, agar dilution, and beta-lactamase tests. Twenty-four strains (18.2%) of H. influenzae were resistant to ampicillin by the agar dilution method, as opposed to 25 strains by the MS-2 method. For a beta-lactamase-negative strain, the agar dilution MIC was 4 micrograms/ml, and the MS-2 MIC was 16 micrograms/ml. Twenty-one strains produced beta-lactamase; two beta-lactamase-negative strains were resistant by MS-2, agar dilution, and agar disk diffusion. In addition, one beta-lactamase-negative strain, for which the agar dilution MIC was 32 micrograms/ml and the MS-2 MIC was 16 micrograms/ml, was sensitive by agar disk diffusion. Overall, the MS-2 method compared favorably with the agar dilution method for determining the MIC of ampicillin, cefamandole, and chloramphenicol for H. influenzae.