JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wood, J C
Right arrow Articles by de la Maza, L M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wood, J C
Right arrow Articles by de la Maza, L M
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 December; 16(6): 1030-1033

Alternatives to the standardized laboratory branch complement fixation test for detection of antibodies to Coccidioides immitis.

J C Wood, G Friedly, M Zartarian, S Aarnaes and L M de la Maza

ABSTRACT

Antibody titers to Coccidioides immitis, using coccidioidin antigen, were determined by three methods: the standardized Laboratory Branch complement fixation method (LBCF), a modified version of the Viral and Rickettsial Disease Laboratory complement fixation test (VRDL-CF), and a quantitative immunodiffusion test (QID). Of the 133 samples evaluated, 72 were negative by each method and 57 (42 serum samples, 15 cerebrospinal fluid samples) were positive by all three methods. Four additional specimens (1 serum sample, 3 cerebrospinal fluid samples) were positive by QID alone. All positive patients were diagnosed clinically as having pulmonary or extrapulmonary coccidioidomycosis or both. When titers from two methods were compared, the agreement within +/- 1 dilution was VRDL-CF/QID, 88.5%; VRDL-CF/LBCF, 85.2%; and LBCF/QID, 82.0%. The agreement of these methods within +/- 2 dilutions was VRDL-CF/QID, 98.4%; VRDL-CF/LBCF, 96.7%; and LBCF/QID, 93.4%. The VRDL-CF and QID methods are simpler to perform; however, they are yet unrecognized as suitable alternatives to the more cumbersome LBCF. Our data show that they should be considered as options for C. immitis serology.


J Clin Microbiol. 1982 December; 16(6): 1030-1033




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.