This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hockey, L J Articles by Edwards, J E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hockey, L J Articles by Edwards, J E, Jr

Detection of fungemia obscured by concomitant bacteremia: in vitro and in vivo studies.

ABSTRACT

Our recent clinical experience suggested that bacteremia may interfere with the detection of concomitant fungemia when standard blood culture methods are used. To determine the extent to which bacteria may interfere with fungal isolation from blood cultures, an in vitro model simulating blood cultures taken during concomitant fungemia and bacteremia was created. Each of six bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) was combined with each of three pathogenic yeasts (Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, and Torulopsis glabrata) in vented blood culture bottles containing enriched brain heart infusion broth and fresh normal human blood. Blood culture bottles were analyzed at 1, 2, and 7 days of incubation. Gram strains and subcultures onto chocolate and MacConkey agars failed to detect fungi in 37.0, 66.7, and 100% of samples, respectively. However, subcultures onto Sabouraud dextrose agar failed in only 13% of the samples (occurring only with P. aeruginosa). In a rabbit model of concomitant fungemia with C. albicans and bacteremia with P. aeruginosa, no yeasts were recovered from blood cultures despite 100% detection of P. aeruginosa. Therefore, the usual microbiological techniques may be inadequate to detect fungemia when concomitant bacteremia is present.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Azoulay, E., Timsit, J.-F., Tafflet, M., de Lassence, A., Darmon, M., Zahar, J.-R., Adrie, C., Garrouste-Orgeas, M., Cohen, Y., Mourvillier, B., Schlemmer, B., the Outcomerea Study Group, (2006). Candida Colonization of the Respiratory Tract and Subsequent Pseudomonas Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Chest 129: 110-117 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Meyer, M.-H., Letscher-Bru, V., Jaulhac, B., Waller, J., Candolfi, E. (2004). Comparison of Mycosis IC/F and Plus Aerobic/F Media for Diagnosis of Fungemia by the Bactec 9240 System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 773-777 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• McDonald, L. C., Weinstein, M. P., Fune, J., Mirrett, S., Reimer, L. G., Reller, L. B. (2001). Controlled Comparison of BacT/ALERT FAN Aerobic Medium and BACTEC Fungal Blood Culture Medium for Detection of Fungemia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 622-624 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jaeger, E. E. M., Carroll, N. M., Choudhury, S., Dunlop, A. A. S., Towler, H. M. A., Matheson, M. M., Adamson, P., Okhravi, N., Lightman, S. (2000). Rapid Detection and Identification of Candida, Aspergillus, and Fusarium Species in Ocular Samples Using Nested PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 2902-2908 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sandven, P., Lassen, J. (1999). Importance of Selective Media for Recovery of Yeasts from Clinical Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3731-3732 [Abstract] [Full Text]