JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thore, A
Right arrow Articles by Anséhn, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thore, A
Right arrow Articles by Anséhn, S
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 February; 17(2): 218-224

Firefly luciferase ATP assay as a screening method for bacteriuria.

A Thore, A Lundin and S Anséhn

ABSTRACT

A rapid (15 min) test for bacteriuria based on firefly luciferase analysis of bacterial ATP has been evaluated in 2,018 clinical urine specimens. The test procedure involves removal of nonbacterial ATP by treatment of urine with Triton X-100 and apyrase, extraction of bacterial ATP by boiling, and bioluminescent analysis of bacterial ATP by firefly luciferase, using a luminometer. For comparison, the widely used nitrite test was included in the study as an example of an alternative rapid chemical test. The test was set up to distinguish between specimens yielding greater than 10(5) CFU/ml and specimens yielding less than 10(5) CFU/ml. A level of 13.5 nM ATP was chosen to define the limit between negative and positive results. At this discriminatory level, 92% of specimens yielding greater than 10(5) CFU/ml and 88% of specimens yielding less than 10(5) CFU/ml were correctly classified with the luciferase method, whereas corresponding figures for the nitrite test were 55 and 99%, respectively. Of the 12% false luciferase positives, 20% were shown to contain greater than 10(5) CFU/ml on prolonged incubation, thus reducing the false-positive rate to 10%. Of the 8% false luciferase negatives, 65% had low levels of CFU in the range of 10(5) to 10(6).


J Clin Microbiol. 1983 February; 17(2): 218-224




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.