JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicolle, L E
Right arrow Articles by Harding, G K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicolle, L E
Right arrow Articles by Harding, G K
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 February; 17(2): 267-271

Characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococci from urinary tract specimens.

L E Nicolle, S A Hoban and G K Harding

ABSTRACT

Species of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from urine specimens submitted from both inpatients and outpatients to the clinical microbiology laboratory of a teaching hospital were identified with a biotyping system, with species then correlated by clinical features and antimicrobial susceptibility. Of 145 isolates, 102 (70%) were Staphylococcus epidermidis, 24 (17%) were Staphylococcus saprophyticus, 7 (4.7%) were Staphylococcus haemolyticus, 4 (2.8%) were Staphylococcus hominis, 3 (2.1%) were Staphylococcus simulans, and 5 (3.4%) were other species. Features characterizing persons with bacteriuria with S. saprophyticus compared with bacteriuria with any other species included female sex (95% versus 52%), young age (median age, 22 years versus 61 years), ambulatory status (hospital outpatients, 86% versus 23%), and absence of indwelling catheters (4.5% versus 49%). All other coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in a setting suggesting nosocomial acquisition, were more frequently resistant to common antimicrobial agents (42% multiply resistant versus 4.2% of S. saprophyticus), and were not distinguished by clinical features. Novobiocin susceptibility, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96%, provided a simple and reliable test for differentiation of S. saprophyticus from other coagulase-negative staphylococci and should be routinely used for urinary tract specimens in the clinical laboratory.


J Clin Microbiol. 1983 February; 17(2): 267-271




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.