This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Preston, D A Articles by Thornsberry, C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Preston, D A Articles by Thornsberry, C

Comparison of the antibacterial spectra of cephalexin and cefaclor with those of cephalothin and newer cephalosporins: reevaluation of the class representative concept of susceptibility testing.

ABSTRACT

The validity of the class representative concept for in vitro susceptibility testing of older cephalosporins was reevaluated. Two oral cephalosporins, cephalexin and cefaclor, were compared with the established cephalosporin class representative, cephalothin, by using reference microdilution minimal inhibitory concentrations of 528 isolates of a wide variety of gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial pathogens. For each comparison, there were only 15 (2.8%) random major and very major interpretive discrepancies. Additional comparisons confirmed the need to test second-generation (cefamandole) and third-generation (cefotaxime) cephalosporins separately. These results provide reasonable assurance that the use of cephalothin as an in vitro predictor of qualitative bacterial susceptibility to these two oral cephalosporins remains an acceptable alternative to testing each antibiotic individually.