This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dennstedt, F E Articles by Davis, J R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dennstedt, F E Articles by Davis, J R

Rapid method for identification and susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli bacteriuria.

ABSTRACT

This report describes a rapid method for the identification and susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli bacteriuria by use of the Autobac urine screen (AUS), a 5-h indole test, and the AutoMicrobic system E. coli Susceptibility Card (AMS-ECSC). All specimens that were AUS negative at 3 and 5 h were reported as negative. All specimens that were AUS positive at 3 or 5 h were removed from the refrigerator and streaked to a MacConkey-blood agar biplate with a 0.001-ml calibrated loop and incubated at 35 degrees C. The standard method for identification and susceptibility testing consisted of inoculating isolated colonies into the AutoMicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae-Plus Biochemical Card and the AutoMicrobic system General Susceptibility Card. Of 915 specimens, 212 (23.2%) were AUS positive at 3 h, of which 112 (52.8%) were indole positive when tryptophan broth was tested at 5 h. The sensitivity and specificity of this screening method for E. coli bacteriuria were 78.8 and 72.2%, respectively. If contaminated cultures were excluded, specificity was 94.4%. When the indole test was positive, 10 microliters of growth from tryptophan broth was used as inoculum for the AMS-ECSC. AMS-ECSC results were final at 12 h. The sensitivity and specificity of the AMS-ECSC for identification of E. coli were 90.4 and 55.0%, respectively. If contaminated cultures were excluded, specificity was 100%. AMS-ECSC susceptibility results demonstrated an overall agreement of 94.3% with the standard method, with 0.5% very major, 3.4% major, and 1.8% minor discrepancies. The biplate was examined after overnight incubation, and when colonies compatible in morphology with E. coli were present in significant numbers, AMS-ECSC results were reported. When discrepancies were found between biplate and AMS-ECSC results, the biplate was processed in the conventional manner. A rapid method for identifying and performing susceptibility tests for approximately 70% of the specimens with E. coli bacteriuria is described.