JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woode, G N
Right arrow Articles by Babiuk, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woode, G N
Right arrow Articles by Babiuk, L

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1983 August; 18(2): 358-364

Antigenic relationships among some bovine rotaviruses: serum neutralization and cross-protection in gnotobiotic calves.

G N Woode, N E Kelso, T F Simpson, S K Gaul, L E Evans and L Babiuk

ABSTRACT

A method was further developed to screen non-tissue-culture-adapted bovine rotaviruses for serotype, using a neutralization test with infectious fecal rotavirus. One of those rotaviruses (B223) which was not blocked by antiserum to the neonatal calf diarrhea virus (NCDV) serotype was then adapted to cell culture in the presence of the antiserum for two or more passages and hyperimmune antiserum to this isolate had a 60-fold-higher homologous neutralization titer than with the NCDV serotype rotavirus. Seventy-three isolates were serotyped and eight (11%) were not of the NCDV serotype (bovine rotavirus serotype I). Of these eight, five belonged to the new bovine rotavirus serotype II and three were not typed, indicating the existence of one or more further serotypes. Cross-protection studies in gnotobiotic calves showed that cross-protection only occurred between rotaviruses of the same serotype, and even a minor serotype difference was sufficient for the calves to show a lack of cross-protection. The serotypes (I and II and the three untyped isolates) also showed differences in the rate of migration in polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of some of their RNA segments (no. 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10), indicating that they were of different electropherotypes.


J Clin Microbiol. 1983 August; 18(2): 358-364




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.