JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levine, J A
Right arrow Articles by Estevez, E G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levine, J A
Right arrow Articles by Estevez, E G
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 October; 18(4): 786-788

Method for concentration of parasites from small amounts of feces.

J A Levine and E G Estevez

ABSTRACT

A total of 258 formalinized stool specimens received in our clinical laboratory were examined for parasites by direct smears and by the standard Formalin-ethyl acetate (FEAc) concentration method. Microconcentration (MC), a miniaturization of the FEAc method, was compared with the standard method for efficiency of parasite recovery. MC employed 0.25 to 0.50 ml of formalinized stools, 0.5 ml of Formalin, and 0.25 ml of ethyl acetate; the washing steps were omitted, whereas the rest of the procedure remained the same as the FEAc method. A total of 36 (13.9%) specimens were positive for parasites; of these, 23 (63.9%) were negative on direct examination. In 14 of these 23 specimens, the FEAc and MC methods were equivalent in detecting parasites. MC failed to detect parasites in eight specimens that were positive by FEAc and detected a parasite in one specimen that was negative by FEAc. Of 14 specimens positive by both concentration methods, FEAc detected additional parasite species in 2 specimens and MC did so in 1 specimen. The reduced sensitivity of parasite concentration evident in the MC we believe to be exclusively due to the drastically reduced sample size. We propose MC as an alternative to the FEAc concentration method when only small amounts of feces can be obtained.


J Clin Microbiol. 1983 October; 18(4): 786-788




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.