JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeGirolami, P C
Right arrow Articles by Rizzo, M F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeGirolami, P C
Right arrow Articles by Rizzo, M F
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 December; 18(6): 1292-1295

Evaluation of the AutoSCAN-3, a device for reading microdilution trays.

P C DeGirolami, K A Eichelberger, L C Salfity and M F Rizzo

ABSTRACT

The AutoSCAN-3 (American MicroScan, Mahwah, N.J.) is an instrument capable of automated reading of commercially available microdilution trays for identification and quantitative susceptibility testing of rapidly growing bacteria. This study compared the results of visual and automated reading of microdilution trays for determination and interpretation of minimum inhibitory concentrations of 471 selected gram-negative and gram-positive clinical bacterial isolates. Visual and automated readings were performed in a double-blind fashion, and all discrepancies were examined by a referee. A quantitative comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations was performed for 201 organisms, yielding 2,472 drug-organism combinations. After exclusion of off-scale values, complete quantitative agreement was obtained in 94% of 959 on-scale combinations, and agreement within +/- 1 well was obtained in 99.3%. Considering the minimum inhibitory concentration interpretations routinely furnished by the instrument, a qualitative comparison was performed for all 471 organisms. Complete agreement in interpretation was obtained in 97.6% of 5,843 drugs-organism combinations, with very major discrepancies accounting for only 0.1% and major discrepancies accounting for 0.2% of all combinations tested.


J Clin Microbiol. 1983 December; 18(6): 1292-1295







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1983 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.