This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tardio, J L Articles by Westhoff, D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tardio, J L Articles by Westhoff, D

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1984 June; 19(6): 783-788

Suitability of the ASM-2 standard test of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for evaluation of antimicrobial disk potency.

ABSTRACT

Standard disks of 25 antimicrobial agents were prepared and tested at three levels of potency (67, 100, and 150% of labeled quantity). The method used was a modification of the approved standard M2-A2 of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Forty-seven susceptibility tests were performed at each potency level by using one to three test organisms. Labeled-potency (100%) disks were within accuracy limits for 85% of the tests and were within daily control limits for 94% of the tests. All susceptibility test data for labeled disks, however, were considered acceptable. The majority (63%) of mean zone diameter data for labeled-content disks were in the upper-one-third percentile of accuracy control limits. A significant proportion (91%) of low-potency disks and considerably fewer (34%) of the high-potency disks were found acceptable when daily control limits were applied. Of most concern are those antimicrobial agents whose low-potency disks approach the lower region of control limits. Zone diameter data from standard disks in the range of potency levels tested suggest that control ranges are excessive for some antimicrobial agent-test organism combinations.