JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacKay, B J
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, J J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacKay, B J
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, J J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1984 June; 19(6): 844-848

Development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determination of lysozyme in human parotid and submandibular-sublingual salivas.

B J MacKay, H Goodman, D Cox, B L Grossbard, V J Iacono and J J Pollock

ABSTRACT

The specificity of lysozyme determinations in human parotid and submandibular-sublingual salivas of two subjects was assessed by comparison of lysozyme concentrations in native acidified salivas with purified enzyme obtained by immunoadsorbent fractionation of the salivas. Lysozyme concentrations were measured by the turbidimetric catalytic method and by a newly developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The validity of the assays was established by comparing assay results with enzyme concentration values determined from optical density-extinction coefficient calculations of the purified lysozyme peak. Values for purified enzyme were found to be similar, irrespective of the assay used to determine lysozyme concentrations, and were in agreement with extinction coefficient calculations. Based on the ELISA technique, recoveries of lysozyme from both parotid and submandibular-sublingual salivas were greater than 75 and 90%, respectively. Similar recoveries were noted for parotid saliva when determinations were based on the turbidimetric assay. However, the ELISA and turbidimetric assays differed with respect to lysozyme levels in submandibular-sublingual saliva because of the apparent presence of an enhancement factor which gave rise to higher lysozyme values in the catalytic assay and therefore resulted in low recoveries of purified enzyme. This catalytic enhancement factor was present in the nonadsorbed fraction of both subjects, as higher lysozyme activities were noted when nonadsorbed fractions were added to affinity-purified lysozymes. Lysozyme levels were also determined in the parotid and submandibular-sublingual salivas of caries-resistant and -susceptible adults. In general, levels of lysozyme in parotid saliva were lower in comparison to submandibular -sublingual saliva; however, significant differences in enzyme concentration were not evident between the caries-resistant and caries-susceptible subjects.


J Clin Microbiol. 1984 June; 19(6): 844-848







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.