JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J B

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1975 July; 2(1): 14-17

Uracil and pyruvate requirements of anaerobic growth of staphylococci.

J B Evans

ABSTRACT

Sixty-six strains of staphylococci recently isolated from human skin and identified as members of the three recognized species of staphylococci, and 21 stock strains representing most of the Baird-Parker subgroups of staphylococci and micrococci were studied. All 16 skin strains of Staphylococcus aureus demonstrated weak to moderate anaerobic growth in the basal medium, growth stimulation by either uracil or pyruvate, and best growth when both were added. The 20 skin strains of S. epidermidis responded similarly to S. aureus but with a tendency toward heavier growth. The 28 isolates of S. saprophyticus generally gave little or no growth in the basal medium, no increase due to pyruvate alone, a weak response to uracil alone, and, with three exceptions, gave moderate to good growth when both supplements were present. The Baird-Parker strains from subgroups S-II and S-III responded like S. epidermidis; those from subgroups S-V, S-VI, M-1, M-2, M-3, and M-6 generally responded like S. saprophyticus; and those from subgroups M-4 and M-5 failed to grow anaerobically in all media.


J Clin Microbiol. 1975 July; 2(1): 14-17




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1975 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.