JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jorgensen, J H
Right arrow Articles by Almeida, R J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jorgensen, J H
Right arrow Articles by Almeida, R J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1984 September; 20(3): 430-433

Rapid recognition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by use of automated test systems.

J H Jorgensen, J Redding, J E Johnson, V Holloway and R J Almeida

ABSTRACT

The ability to rapidly recognize methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by use of two automated instrument systems, the MS-2 system (Abbott Laboratories, Diagnostics Division, Irving, Tex.) and the AutoMicrobic system (Vitek Systems, Hazelwood, Mo.), was evaluated on a collection of 95 methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates recovered from at least six geographical areas of the United States. Isolates were simultaneously tested with both systems, and the results were compared with MIC tests performed by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards agar dilution method. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were defined as those with a methicillin MIC greater than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml by the reference procedure. Overall, with the AutoMicrobic system, 94.7% of 95 methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were detected, and with the MS-2 system, 91.6% of the isolates were detected. Isolates with methicillin MICs greater than or equal to 32 micrograms/ml were readily detected with both systems (41 of 42 isolates). Of 53 isolates from three locales with methicillin MICs of 8 or 16 micrograms/ml, 90.6% (48) were detected by the AutoMicrobic system, whereas 86.8% (46) were detected by the MS-2 system. A program update which has been added to the MS-2 system prints a warning message indicating possible methicillin-resistant S. aureus with isolates which demonstrate multiple antibiotic resistance (greater than or equal to four drugs other than methicillin). This warning message would have provided presumptive recognition of six of eight isolates with discrepant results for methicillin by the MS-2 system.


J Clin Microbiol. 1984 September; 20(3): 430-433




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.