JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wayne, L G
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, C K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wayne, L G
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, C K

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1984 October; 20(4): 722-729

Diagnostic probability matrix for identification of slowly growing mycobacteria in clinical laboratories.

L G Wayne, M I Krichevsky, D Portyrata and C K Jackson

ABSTRACT

A probability matrix is presented for identification of slowly growing mycobacteria that are likely to be encountered in clinical laboratories. The matrix includes 23 features that are useful for identifying members of 14 species or species complexes. The computer program identifies strains as a function of the ID (identification) score, which measures the discrimination among possible alternative identifications, and the R (ratio) score, which measures the degree of fit to the most likely taxa. It is not necessary to employ all 23 tests when initiating an identification; the program will suggest additional tests to perform when a partial data set fails to yield a definitive identification. Two independent sets of cultures comprising a total of 1,212 strains were used to test the matrix. Correct diagnoses were based on clustering behavior in numerical taxonomic analysis with larger numbers of features. The probable efficiencies with the two sets were 94.2 and 83.4%, respectively, and the accuracy of the definitive identifications for both sets exceeded 95%. A discussion is presented of situations when it may be appropriate to override an R score that has caused the rejection of an identification and to thereby enhance the efficiency.


J Clin Microbiol. 1984 October; 20(4): 722-729







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.