JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, D
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, G W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, D
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, G W

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1985 May; 21(5): 830-834

Comparison of serodiagnosis of group B coxsackievirus infections by an immunoglobulin M capture enzyme immunoassay versus microneutralization.

D Chan and G W Hammond

ABSTRACT

A solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with the capture antibody principle was developed and evaluated for detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) specific for group B coxsackieviruses (CBV) in human serum. Of 19 patients who were culture positive for CBV type 4 infections, the EIA for CBV type 4 IgM was more sensitive (84%; 16/19 positive) than a standard microneutralization test (16%; 3/19 positive) and a microneutralization assay on the IgM fractions obtained by sucrose density gradient fractionation of human serum (68%; 13/19 positive). The attempt to produce a serotype-specific EIA was not successful, as IgM antibodies were detected to heterotypic CBV. The pooled CBV types 2 to 5 IgM EIA demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 88% (21/24 positive) in comparison to virus isolation for CBV types 4 and 5. The EIA was specific for IgM to CBV, with the exception of some cross-reactions with hepatitis A IgM-positive sera (15%; 3/20). In comparison to the microneutralization test, the EIA for pooled CBV IgM was more rapid, less cumbersome, and more sensitive. Commercially available reagents used in this study enable the CBV IgM EIA to be developed in diagnostic virology laboratories.


J Clin Microbiol. 1985 May; 21(5): 830-834




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.