This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haley, C E
Right arrow Articles by Mackowiak, P A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haley, C E
Right arrow Articles by Mackowiak, P A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1985 June; 21(6): 991-992

Bactericidal activity of antiseptics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

C E Haley, M Marling-Cason, J W Smith, J P Luby and P A Mackowiak

ABSTRACT

Various commonly used antiseptics were tested against three strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at stock strength and in serial 10-fold dilutions. The stock solutions of 4% chlorhexidine gluconate-alcohol (Hibiclens), 1% p-chloro-m-xylenol (Acute-Kare), and 3% hexachlorophene (Phisohex) produced 2-log reductions of MRSA after a 15-s exposure, but even after 240 s, these solutions failed to kill all the MRSA. Povidone-iodine (Betadine) solution was maximally effective at the 1:100 dilution, killing all the MRSA within 15 s; other dilutions were less effective, though each killed the MRSA within 120 s. Similar results were obtained with three different strains of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus. Thus, of the four most commonly used antiseptics, povidone-iodine, when diluted 1:100, was the most rapidly bactericidal against both MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus.


J Clin Microbiol. 1985 June; 21(6): 991-992




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Malapaka, V. R.R., Barrese, A. A., Tripp, B. C., Tripp, B. C. (2007). High-Throughput Screening for Antimicrobial Compounds Using a 96-Well Format Bacterial Motility Absorbance Assay. J Biomol Screen 12: 849-854 [Abstract]  
  • Brady, A., Loughlin, R., Gilpin, D., Kearney, P., Tunney, M. (2006). In vitro activity of tea-tree oil against clinical skin isolates of meticillin-resistant and -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci growing planktonically and as biofilms.. J Med Microbiol 55: 1375-1380 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kampf, G., Kramer, A. (2004). Epidemiologic Background of Hand Hygiene and Evaluation of the Most Important Agents for Scrubs and Rubs. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17: 863-893 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • MESSAGER, S., GODDARD, P.A., DETTMAR, P.W., MAILLARD, J.-Y. (2001). Determination of the antibacterial efficacy of several antiseptics tested on skin by an 'ex-vivo' test. J Med Microbiol 50: 284-292 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nash, R. W., Lindquist, T. D., Kalina, R. E. (1991). An Evaluation of Saline Irrigation and Comparison of Povidone-Iodine and Antibiotic in the Surface Decontamination of Donor Eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 109: 869-872 [Abstract]