This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Martin, E T Articles by Martin, W J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Martin, E T Articles by Martin, W J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1985 July; 22(1): 19-22

Clinical evaluation of the Lumac bioluminescence method for screening urine specimens.

ABSTRACT

A bioluminescence method for screening urine cultures to provide rapid reporting of negative specimens and to select appropriate urine cultures for direct application of automated identification methods was evaluated. A total of 2,000 specimens were processed in the Lumac Biocounter (3M, St. Paul, Minn.), and the results were compared with quantitative culture techniques by using a 0.001-ml inoculating loop. A total of 841 specimens were positive by the bioluminescence method; 291 specimens were culture positive (greater than or equal to 50,000 CFU of one or two organisms per ml). Positive cultures represented more than 20 different organisms. Approximately two-thirds of the false-positive results represented mixed flora or pure cultures of less than 5 X 10(4) organisms per ml. The predictive value of a negative result was 98.4%, reflecting a false-negative rate of only 0.7%. No advantages in cost or technician time were noted, but the Lumac method appears to be a useful technique in decreasing reporting time, especially for negative urine cultures.