JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gary, G W
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, L J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gary, G W, Jr
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, L J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1985 August; 22(2): 274-278

Detection of Norwalk virus antibodies and antigen with a biotin-avidin immunoassay.

G W Gary Jr, J E Kaplan, S E Stine and L J Anderson

ABSTRACT

Biotin-avidin immunoassays (BAIs) were developed to detect Norwalk virus antigen and to measure Norwalk virus antibody. The BAI detected Norwalk virus infections by a fourfold titer rise in antibody in sera or by antigen in stool, with a sensitivity similar to or greater than that of the radioimmunoassay (RIA), and the BAI appeared to be more sensitive than the RIA for detecting antibody in single serum specimens. The BAI antigen test detected Norwalk antigen in all stools that were positive by the RIA, and in two stools negative by the RIA. Of 106 serum pairs tested by both the RIA and BAI, 94 demonstrated seroconversion, or lack of seroconversion, in both assays; 12 gave discordant results. Titers by the BAI generally exceeded those by the RIA by two- or fourfold. The BAI had advantages over the RIA in that it had added sensitivity in the detection of Norwalk antibody, was less time consuming, did not require frequent labeling of antibody, and did not have the problems associated with the use of isotopes.


J Clin Microbiol. 1985 August; 22(2): 274-278




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.