This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Plorde, J J Articles by Carlson, L G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Plorde, J J Articles by Carlson, L G

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1985 August; 22(2): 292-295

Specimen volume versus yield in the BACTEC blood culture system.

ABSTRACT

During a 24-month period, 5,625 blood culture specimens were collected at the Seattle Veterans Administration Medical Center in 20-ml volumes and divided into separate 10-ml aliquots. The two aliquots were processed as duplicate sets (set 1, set 2) by the BACTEC system (Johnston Laboratories, Inc., Towson, Md.). Specimens (5 ml) from each set were inoculated into aerobic (6B) and anaerobic (7C/7D) vials. A total of 434 significantly positive blood cultures were found. In 342 of these positive cultures, yielding 379 isolates (112 members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, 104 staphylococci, 87 streptococci, 27 anaerobes, 20 yeasts, 14 pseudomonads, and 15 miscellaneous organisms), there was adequate specimen volume to fill all four vials. The utilization of set 1 would have resulted only in the failure to detect 65 of 379 (17.2%) significant isolates, 52 of 342 (15.2%) positive cultures, and 20 of 198 (10.1%) bacteremic episodes. There were no significant differences in the recovery of individual species in sets 1 and 2. Although the range of isolates recovered by the aerobic and anaerobic vials of each set differed, the percent yield of total isolates was similar, indicating total isolate yield was predominantly a function of specimen volume. The addition of set 2 most dramatically increased the recovery of Escherichia coli (30%), yeasts (33%), and anaerobes (42%).

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Riedel, S., Bourbeau, P., Swartz, B., Brecher, S., Carroll, K. C., Stamper, P. D., Dunne, W. M., McCardle, T., Walk, N., Fiebelkorn, K., Sewell, D., Richter, S. S., Beekmann, S., Doern, G. V. (2008). Timing of Specimen Collection for Blood Cultures from Febrile Patients with Bacteremia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1381-1385 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nicola, F. G., Weinstein, M. P., Lee, A., Reller, L. B., Mirrett, S. (2008). Assessing How Many Blood Cultures Are Needed for Detecting Bloodstream Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 1155-1156 [Full Text]  
• Bouza, E., Sousa, D., Rodriguez-Creixems, M., Lechuz, J. G., Munoz, P. (2007). Is the Volume of Blood Cultured Still a Significant Factor in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections?. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45: 2765-2769 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Connell, T. G., Rele, M., Cowley, D., Buttery, J. P., Curtis, N. (2007). How Reliable Is a Negative Blood Culture Result? Volume of Blood Submitted for Culture in Routine Practice in a Children's Hospital. Pediatrics 119: 891-896 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Buttery, J P (2002). Blood cultures in newborns and children: optimising an everyday test. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 87: F25-28 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Archibald, L. K., Dobbie, H., Kazembe, P., Nwanyanwu, O., McKnight, C., Byrne, T., Addison, R. M., Bell, M., Reller, L. B., Jarvis, W. R. (2001). Utility of Paired BACTEC MYCO/F LYTIC Blood Culture Vials for Detection of Bacteremia, Mycobacteremia, and Fungemia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 1960-1962 [Abstract] [Full Text]