This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McHugh, T M Articles by Stites, D P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McHugh, T M Articles by Stites, D P

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1985 December; 22(6): 1014-1019

Comparison of six methods for the detection of antibody to cytomegalovirus.

ABSTRACT

Five commercial assays were compared to a standardized complement fixation (CF) test for the detection of antibody to cytomegalovirus. Two hundred and thirty serum specimens were analyzed. In addition, nine pairs of acute- and convalescent-phase sera were tested by two of the commercial assays. The assays were compared as to sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value, as well as incidence of false-positive and -negative results. Samples which did not agree in all the assays were retested and tested with an indirect fluorescent-antibody assay. Of 228 specimens, 103 (45.2%) were positive by CF. Of the 230 samples, 2 (0.9%) were inconclusive by CF and readable in the other assays. Of the 230 specimens, 97 (42.2%) were positive by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA; Litton Bionetics), 100 (43.5%) were positive by a second EIA (Abbott Laboratories), 104 (45.2%) were positive by a third EIA (M. A. Bioproducts). One hundred and eight (47.0%) were positive by indirect hemagglutination (IHA; Cetus Corporation), and 110 (47.8%) were positive by latex agglutination (LA; Hynson, Westcott and Dunning). Sensitivity and specificity were similar with all the assays (93 to 100%). The greater numbers of positive results by IHA and LA were confirmed by repeat CF testing at less than 1:8 dilution, and by indirect fluorescent-antibody assay. Acute- and convalescent-phase serum pairs showed a significant rise in antibody titer when tested by anticomplement immunofluorescence, IHA, and LA. There was good agreement among the assays, with LA having the highest sensitivity.