This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lipkin, E S Articles by Schachter, J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lipkin, E S Articles by Schachter, J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1986 January; 23(1): 114-117

Comparison of monoclonal antibody staining and culture in diagnosing cervical chlamydial infection.

E S Lipkin, J V Moncada, M A Shafer, T E Wilson and J Schachter

ABSTRACT

We compared a fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibody (FA) direct specimen test (MicroTrak; Syva Co., Palo Alto, Calif.) with culture (TC) in McCoy cells (vials, with blind passage and iodine staining of inclusions) for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the cervix. Duplicate specimens were collected from 1,230 women, but for 262 of these subjects, both results were unavailable (150 FA smears were inadequate, indicating a need for clinical training in specimen collection), leaving 968 comparisons. Prevalence of chlamydiae by culture was 13% (126/968). Compared with TC results, the sensitivity of FA was 70% (88/126) and the specificity was 94% (795/842). There was a 91% agreement (883/968). The predictive value of a positive FA test was 65% (88/135), and that of a negative FA was 95% (795/833). We reexamined 38 smears for which paired results were discrepant, and the reread would have changed the result in only 5 of these. TC is less than 100% sensitive and some FA-positive, TC-negative specimens represent positive specimens not detected by TC. Unfortunately, it is not possible to identify which results in this group are truly false-positive. Clearly, the FA procedure has a performance profile which would make it a useful tool in screening high-risk populations (particularly when TC is not available) but it is less suited to screening low-risk populations, for which false-positive results are more important. The greater utility of the FA procedure in a venereal disease clinic was confirmed by testing 172 evaluable specimen pairs, of which 34 (20%) were Chlamydia isolate positive. The FA sensitivity was 76% (26/34) and specificity was 96% (133/138), giving a predictive value of 84% (26/31) for a positive test.

---

J Clin Microbiol. 1986 January; 23(1): 114-117

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kellogg, J. A., Vanderhoff, B. T., Seiple, J. W., Hick, M. E. (1994). Comparison of First-Voided Urine Specimens With Endocervical Swab Specimens for Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Women. Arch Fam Med 3: 672-675 [Abstract]  
• Sellors, J. W., Pickard, L., Gafni, A., Goldsmith, C. H., Jang, D., Mahony, J. B., Chernesky, M. A. (1992). Effectiveness and Efficiency of Selective vs Universal Screening for Chlamydial Infection in Sexually Active Young Women. Arch Intern Med 152: 1837-1844 [Abstract]  
• Remafedi, G., Abdalian, S. E. (1989). Clinical Predictors of Chlamydia trachomatis Endocervicitis in Adolescent Women: Looking for the Right Combination. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 143: 1437-1442 [Abstract]  
• Nettleman, M. D., Jones, R. B. (1988). Cost-effectiveness of Screening Women at Moderate Risk for Genital Infections Caused by Chlamydia trachomatis. JAMA 260: 207-213 [Abstract]  
• STAMM, W. E. (1988). Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Genitourinary Infections. ANN INTERN MED 108: 710-717 [Abstract]  
• PHILLIPS, R. S., ARONSON, M. D., TAYLOR, W. C., SAFRAN, C. (1987). Should Tests for Chlamydia trachomatis Cervical Infection Be Done During Routine Gynecologic Visits? An Analysis of the Costs of Alternative Strategies. ANN INTERN MED 107: 188-194 [Abstract]