JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sifuentes-Osornio, J
Right arrow Articles by Gröschel, D H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sifuentes-Osornio, J
Right arrow Articles by Gröschel, D H

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1986 February; 23(2): 230-234

Analysis of epidemiologic markers of nosocomial Serratia marcescens isolates with special reference to the Grimont biotyping system.

J Sifuentes-Osornio, G M Ruiz-Palacios and D H Gröschel

ABSTRACT

Seventy-one strains of Serratia marcescens obtained from hospitalized patients of the Instituto Nacional de la Nutricion in Mexico City and two Virginia hospitals (University of Virginia Medical Center and Norfolk General Hospital) were analyzed to find markers useful for the epidemiologic investigation of outbreaks with this organism. Biotyping with commercial microwell systems (API 20# system [Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.] and DMS Rapid NFT [DMS Laboratories, Inc., Flemington, N.J.]) was not useful. Biotyping with the system designed by Grimont (assimilation tests, pigment production, and the ability to reduce tetrathionate broth) was helpful to characterize all strains. Of the 37 Mexican strains, 36 belonged to biogroup A 5/8 and 32 were biotype A8b. The 34 strains from the Virginia hospitals were distributed among six different biogroups and 12 biotypes. Significant differences in antimicrobial susceptibility (50% MIC, microgram/ml) between Mexican and Virginia strains were seen with carbenicillin (256 versus 8), piperacillin (64 versus 4), amikacin (16 versus 2), gentamicin (2 versus 0.5), and tobramycin (16 versus 2). Some Mexican strains showed variability in the susceptibility to amikacin because they were low producers of 6'-N-acetyltransferase type I. The Mexican strains seemed to come from a hospital with cross-infection problems because most were isolated from urine, were multiresistant, and more nonpigmented; in contrast, the strains isolated at University of Virginia Medical Center represent the experience of a hospital with scattered S. marcescens infections. The Grimont biotyping scheme is a useful epidemiologic tool for the clinical microbiologist.


J Clin Microbiol. 1986 February; 23(2): 230-234







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.