This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Henry, D Articles by Smith, J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Henry, D Articles by Smith, J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1986 April; 23(4): 718-724

Comparative evaluation of four systems for determining susceptibility of gram-positive organisms.

ABSTRACT

A study was undertaken to compare four commercial systems for testing the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of gram-positive cocci. The reference method was an agar dilution method. The systems evaluated were the MS-2 system (Abbott Diagnostics Div., Mississauga, Ontario), the AutoMicrobic system (AMS) (Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) with the gram-positive susceptibility (GPS) card, the Sceptor system (BBL Microbiology Systems, distributed by Becton Dickenson, Canada Inc., Mississauga, Ontario), and the Micro-Media system (Beckman Instruments, Inc., Anaheim, Calif.). There was a greater than 98% essential accord (EA) between all test results and the reference method results when testing 134 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. In testing 79 isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci the EA was greater than 97% with all systems except the MS-2. In the MS-2 system only, 30% of tests were interrupted by the instrument because of insufficient growth in the control chamber. Excluding the Sceptor system, the EA was greater than 96% on testing 70 isolates of enterococcus. In testing 15 isolates of group B Streptococcus there was 91% EA with the AMS and Sceptor systems and only 71 and 88% EA with the MS-2 and Micro-Media systems, respectively. The new AMS GPS MIC card was tested against 29 methicillin-resistant S. aureus, 10 coagulase-negative staphylococci, and 9 enterococci, and it gave more accurate results than the earlier GPS breakpoint card. The Micro-Media and MS-2 systems did not reliably detect marginally methicillin-resistant S. aureus. The MS-2 was the least expensive system to operate on a cost per test basis ($3.59 Can.), whereas the Sceptor was the most expensive system ($5.29 Can.). The AMS ws the least labor intensive (0.9 min per test), and the Sceptor system was the most time consuming (2.9 min per test).

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Yamazumi, T., Marshall, S. A., Wilke, W. W., Diekema, D. J., Pfaller, M. A., Jones, R. N. (2001). Comparison of the Vitek Gram-Positive Susceptibility 106 Card and the MRSA-Screen Latex Agglutination Test for Determining Oxacillin Resistance in Clinical Bloodstream Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 53-56 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ribeiro, J., Vieira, F. D., King, T., D'Arezzo, J. B., Boyce, J. M. (1999). Misclassification of Susceptible Strains of Staphylococcus aureus as Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus by a Rapid Automated Susceptibility Testing System. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 1619-1620 [Abstract] [Full Text]