JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tjiam, K H
Right arrow Articles by Michel, M F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tjiam, K H
Right arrow Articles by Michel, M F

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1986 April; 23(4): 752-754

Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections in urogenital specimens.

K H Tjiam, B Y van Heijst, A van Zuuren, J H Wagenvoort, T van Joost, E Stolz and M F Michel

ABSTRACT

A total of 194 male urethral and 402 cervical specimens were obtained from patients at the venereal disease outpatient clinic of University Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, to evaluate the IDEIA test (Boots Celltech) for the detection of chlamydial infections. The prevalences of culture-positive males and females were 17.5 and 8.2%, respectively. The respective overall sensitivities and specificities found were 67.6 and 93.7% for the males and 63.6 and 93.8% for the females. The highest sensitivity (83.3%) was found in male patients with more than 20 leukocytes per field in the sediment of the first-voided urine (magnification, X250) and in women with more than 10 leukocytes per field in a cervical Gram stain (magnification, X800). However, in men without urethritis and in women with fewer than 10 leukocytes per field in the Gram stain, sensitivities of 44.4 and 40%, respectively, were found. Culture-positive, IDEIA-negative results were predominantly observed in samples with few inclusions in the culture.


J Clin Microbiol. 1986 April; 23(4): 752-754







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.