JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aoyama, T
Right arrow Articles by Sato, Y
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aoyama, T
Right arrow Articles by Sato, Y

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1986 June; 23(6): 1046-1048

Comparison of blood-free medium (cyclodextrin solid medium) with Bordet-Gengou medium for clinical isolation of Bordetella pertussis.

T Aoyama, Y Murase, T Iwata, A Imaizumi, Y Suzuki and Y Sato

ABSTRACT

Cyclodextrin solid medium (CSM) developed by us was evaluated to be a suitable synthetic medium for the clinical isolation of Bordetella pertussis when compared with Bordet-Gengou (BG) medium. The addition of 5 micrograms of cephalexin (CEX) per ml to CSM not only supported the good growth of B. pertussis but also sufficiently suppressed the growth of nasopharyngeal flora. During period 1 of this study, nasopharyngeal specimens from 60 patients with clinical pertussis were inoculated on CSM supplemented with 5 micrograms of CEX per ml. The isolation rate was 70% (42 of 60). To confirm the efficacy of CSM, another study was performed. During period 2 of this study, nasopharyngeal specimens were cultured on both CSM and BG medium, each with 5 micrograms of CEX per ml. The comparative isolation rates were 100% (40 of 40 specimens from 29 patients) on CSM with 5 micrograms of CEX and 65% (26 out of 40) on BG medium with 5 micrograms of CEX. The excellent efficacy of CSM as measured by the isolation rate was thought to be due to the poor nutrition of this medium for the growth of nasopharyngeal bacteria. CSM retained its efficacy in clinical isolations even after 3 months of storage in a refrigerator. These data led us to conclude that CSM with 5 micrograms of CEX was much better than BG medium with 5 micrograms of CEX, determined by both the isolation rate and preservativity considerations, and that CSM with 5 micrograms of CEX per ml can be successfully used instead of BG medium as a medium for the clinical isolation of B. pertussis.


J Clin Microbiol. 1986 June; 23(6): 1046-1048




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.