JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, H M
Right arrow Articles by Forsythe, S B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pollock, H M
Right arrow Articles by Forsythe, S B

Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1986 July; 24(1): 1-6

Selection of a reference lot of Mueller-Hinton agar.

H M Pollock, A L Barry, T L Gavan, P C Fuchs, S Hansen, C L Thornsberry, H Frankel and S B Forsythe

ABSTRACT

A collaborative study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of currently marketed Mueller-Hinton agars from seven manufacturers by replicate disk diffusion tests with standard quality control strains. Identification of the manufacturers was concealed, and the resulting data were evaluated for the selection of a physical reagent standard against which the performance of future production lots would be tested and made to conform. A medium was selected which was sufficiently close to existing National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards quality control limits that current interpretive criteria would require minimum modification. Two of the seven lots were eliminated from further consideration because the final pHs were outside acceptable limits. The remaining four lots had 96% of mean zone diameters less than or equal to 2 mm from those of the chosen lot and 65% of the means were less than or equal to 1 mm from those of the chosen lot for all 28 antimicrobial agent-organism combinations. Manufacturers then attempted to produce new lots of Mueller-Hinton agar which performed within the prescribed limits of the chosen lot. One lot performed in close conformity with the selected standard, but the overall performance of the media was essentially the same as that of the randomly chosen lots in the initial study. It was concluded that one of the original seven lots demonstrated properties which made it a tentative candidate for a physical reagent standard and that the use of a physical reagent standard in evaluating production lots might aid in stabilizing the performance of Mueller-Hinton agar.


J Clin Microbiol. 1986 July; 24(1): 1-6







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.