JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clements, M L
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, B R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clements, M L
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, B R

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1986 July; 24(1): 47-51

Evaluation of avian-human reassortant influenza A/Washington/897/80 x A/Pintail/119/79 virus in monkeys and adult volunteers.

M L Clements, M H Snyder, A J Buckler-White, E L Tierney, W T London and B R Murphy

ABSTRACT

A reassortant influenza A virus was produced by mating an avian influenza A/Pintail/Alberta/119/79 (H4N6) virus with wild-type human influenza A/Washington/897/80 (H3N2) virus. The avian-human influenza A reassortant virus contained the genes coding for the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase surface antigens of the human influenza wild-type virus and the six other RNA segments (internal genes) of the avian influenza A virus donor. In the lower respiratory tract of squirrel monkeys, this avian-human influenza reassortant virus, like its avian influenza A parent virus, was restricted approximately 100-fold in replication compared with the wild-type human influenza A virus. Despite this restriction of replication, infection of monkeys with the avian-human influenza A reassortant virus induced resistance to wild-type human influenza A virus challenge. In comparison with the wild-type human influenza A virus, the avian-human influenza A reassortant was also fully attenuated when 10(5.5) to 10(7.5) 50% tissue culture infective doses were administered to susceptible adult volunteers. Attenuation was indicated by a more than 300-fold reduction in virus shedding and lack of reactogenicity. The reassortant virus did not spread to susceptible contacts and could not be isolated from the blood or stools of infected adults. The 50% human infectious dose was 10(6.2) 50% tissue culture infective dose, indicating that this reassortant virus is only slightly less infectious for adults than a similarly derived avian-human influenza A/Washington/80 X A/Mallard/78 reassortant virus. These findings suggest that the avian influenza A/Pintail/79 virus may be a satisfactory donor of attenuating genes for production of live, attenuated avian-human influenza A reassortant virus vaccines.

J Clin Microbiol. 1986 July; 24(1): 47-51




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.