This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Heard, S R Articles by Tabaqchali, S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Heard, S R Articles by Tabaqchali, S

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1986 September; 24(3): 384-387

Immunoblotting to demonstrate antigenic and immunogenic differences among nine standard strains of Clostridium difficile.

ABSTRACT

The epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease is being elucidated with the development of typing schemes for the organism. We recently described a new typing scheme based on the incorporation of [35S]methionine into bacterial proteins followed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. Nine standard strains were identified. We report here some observations on the antigenic differences among these nine strains when studied by immunoblotting. Type-specific rabbit antiserum was raised against each of the nine standard strains. Immunoblotting of the strains with these antisera demonstrated, in addition to the presence of shared, common proteins, a type-specific response with homologous antisera. When [35S]methionine-labeled C. difficile proteins were immunoblotted with homologous and heterologous antisera, both the immunoblots and the autoradiographs demonstrated the same strain-specific response. These strain-specific proteins, which have been so useful for epidemiological and typing purposes, were also immunogenic.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• SPIGAGLIA, P., CARDINES, R., ROSSI, S., MENOZZI, M.G., MASTRANTONIO, P. (2001). Molecular typing and long-term comparison of Clostridium difficile strains by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and PCR-ribotyping. J Med Microbiol 50: 407-414 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Bidet, P., Lalande, V., Salauze, B., Burghoffer, B., Avesani, V., Delmée, M., Rossier, A., Barbut, F., Petit, J.-C. (2000). Comparison of PCR-Ribotyping, Arbitrarily Primed PCR, and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis for Typing Clostridium difficile. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 2484-2487 [Abstract] [Full Text]