This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Campbell, L A Articles by Grayston, J T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Campbell, L A Articles by Grayston, J T

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1987 October; 25(10): 1911-1916

Characterization of the new Chlamydia agent, TWAR, as a unique organism by restriction endonuclease analysis and DNA-DNA hybridization.

Department of Pathobiology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

ABSTRACT

Several molecular techniques were used for comparison of the novel Chlamydia agent, TWAR, with Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia psittaci. Unlike all serotypes of C. trachomatis and most strains of C. psittaci, the eight TWAR isolates examined did not contain extrachromosomal DNA. TWAR was readily distinguished from C. trachomatis or C. psittaci by restriction endonuclease analysis, whereas identical or nearly identical restriction patterns were observed among the TWAR isolates. Southern blot analysis with a gene encoding a portion of the C. trachomatis serovar L2 major outer membrane protein as the probe showed that TWAR, like C. psittaci, contained sequences homologous to this gene. However, while the hybridization patterns were identical for all TWAR isolates, they differed from those of any of the other Chlamydia species tested. A PstI gene bank containing TWAR DNA was constructed in pUC19. Random fragments were purified and used for probing Chlamydia chromosomal digests. All of the five probes tested were TWAR specific, with the TWAR isolates showing identical patterns of homology. Qualitative studies of the DNA homology revealed that TWAR did not have significant homology to any of the Chlamydia strains assayed. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the TWAR isolates represent a single strain or closely allied genotypes and are clearly distinct from any of the other chlamydiae tested.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Li, Z., Chen, D., Zhong, Y., Wang, S., Zhong, G. (2008). The Chlamydial Plasmid-Encoded Protein pgp3 Is Secreted into the Cytosol of Chlamydia-Infected Cells. Infect. Immun. 76: 3415-3428 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Pickett, M. A., Everson, J. S., Pead, P. J., Clarke, I. N. (2005). The plasmids of Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydophila pneumoniae (N16): accurate determination of copy number and the paradoxical effect of plasmid-curing agents. Microbiology 151: 893-903 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Koh, W. P., Taylor, M. B, Hughes, K., Chew, S K, Fong, C W, Phoon, M C, Kang, K L, Chow, V. T. (2002). Seroprevalence of IgG antibodies against Chlamydia pneumoniae in Chinese, Malays and Asian Indians in Singapore. Int J Epidemiol 31: 1001-1007 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Boman, J., Gaydos, C. A., Quinn, T. C. (1999). Molecular Diagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae Infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3791-3799 [Full Text]  
• Meijer, A., Morré, S. A., Van Den Brule, A. J. C., Savelkoul, P. H. M., Ossewaarde, J. M. (1999). Genomic Relatedness of Chlamydia Isolates Determined by Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis. J. Bacteriol. 181: 4469-4475 [Abstract] [Full Text]